AI Systematic Review Protocol
Prompt
Create a comprehensive protocol for your AI project following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and PROSPERO registration requirements for systematic reviews. This protocol should be detailed and structured from start to finish, including all essential components to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and adherence to best practices. Your protocol must include the following elements in detail: 1. **Title:** A concise and informative title reflecting the review's focus. 2. **Research Question:** Clearly define the main research question your AI systematic review will address. 3. **Objectives:** Specify primary and secondary objectives. 4. **PICO Framework:** Formulate the question using the PICO model: - **Population:** Describe the population or dataset relevant to your AI study. - **Intervention:** Define the AI method, algorithm, or technology being evaluated. - **Comparison:** Specify the control or alternative intervention, if applicable. - **Outcomes:** List primary and secondary outcome measures to assess intervention effectiveness. 5. **Eligibility Criteria:** Inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies/databases—defining study types, settings, languages, dates, and AI-specific considerations. 6. **Information Sources:** Detail the databases, registries, and other sources where studies will be searched. 7. **Search Strategy:** Develop a comprehensive, reproducible search strategy including keywords, Boolean operators, and filters. 8. **Study Selection Process:** Describe the screening and selection methodology, including the number of reviewers and conflict resolution. 9. **Data Extraction:** Outline the data extraction forms, data items collected (e.g., AI model specifications, performance metrics), and quality assurance steps. 10. **Risk of Bias Assessment:** Describe tools/methods for assessing risk of bias or quality in included studies. 11. **Data Synthesis and Analysis:** Define your approach to synthesize data (qualitative and/or quantitative), including statistical methods, meta-analysis plans, and handling of heterogeneity. 12. **Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses:** Specify any planned subgroup analyses or sensitivity analyses. 13. **Assessment of Reporting Biases:** Explain methods to detect publication or reporting bias. 14. **Ethics and Dissemination:** Address ethical considerations and plans for dissemination of results. 15. **PROSPERO Registration:** Include the process and anticipated timing for PROSPERO registration. # Steps - Begin by drafting the protocol title and research question based on your AI project's focus. - Clearly develop the PICO elements tailored to AI interventions. - Define comprehensive eligibility criteria and an exhaustive search strategy. - Detail methodological steps for study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal. - Specify analytic strategies including data synthesis, statistical analysis, and bias assessments. - Outline ethical considerations, dissemination plans, and PROSPERO registration information. # Output Format Provide the protocol as a structured document with clearly labeled sections corresponding to the numbered elements above. Use formal academic writing style appropriate for submission to PROSPERO and publication. Include bullet points or numbered lists where appropriate for clarity. Avoid superfluous explanations—focus on completeness and adherence to PRISMA and PROSPERO standards.
Related Literature Review Prompts
3D Printed Concrete Research Question
Identify the most suitable research question related to 3D printed concrete for a limited meta-analysis. Consider current trends, gaps in existing literature, and practical implications of the research. Ensure the question is focused and specific enough to allow for meaningful analysis of relevant studies. ### Steps: 1. **Review Existing Literature**: Briefly summarize key findings and gaps in 3D printed concrete research. 2. **Identify Trends**: Highlight any emerging trends or technologies in the field. 3. **Focus Areas**: Determine which aspects (e.g., material properties, sustainability, structural integrity) are most impactful. 4. **Formulate the Question**: Create a clear, concise, and specific research question that can be analyzed through meta-analysis. ### Output Format: Provide the selected research question along with a brief rationale explaining why it was chosen based on your analysis of the literature and identified trends.
Academic Article Enrichment
You are an expert academic advisor specializing in international relations. Your task is to analyze the given academic article and suggest ideas and arguments that could enrich its content to elevate it to a high-level, publishable standard suitable for leading international relations journals. When providing suggestions: - Identify gaps or underdeveloped areas in the article's argumentation or literature review. - Propose advanced theoretical frameworks or empirical evidence that could strengthen the article. - Recommend relevant contemporary debates or case studies that align with the article's focus. - Ensure that all suggestions are rigorous, original, and contribute to scholarly discourse. - Present your suggestions clearly and logically, fostering critical engagement. # Steps 1. Thoroughly review the article to understand its thesis, structure, and key arguments. 2. Assess the article’s strengths and weaknesses in terms of content depth and academic rigor. 3. Suggest new ideas and arguments, specifying how they enhance or complement existing material. 4. Reference relevant literature, theories, or case studies to support your recommendations. # Output Format Provide a structured list of suggestions, each with a concise title and a detailed explanation. Include references or examples where applicable. # Notes - Tailor suggestions specifically to international relations scholarship. - Avoid general or vague advice; be precise and relevant.
10-Year Literature Review
Organize and present a comprehensive review of related literature published within the last 10 years. Focus on summarizing key themes, findings, methodologies, and trends relevant to the specified topic. Prioritize clarity, coherence, and proper citation style if applicable. Ensure the literature selected is recent and relevant to effectively capture the current state of knowledge. # Steps 1. Identify the core topic or research question. 2. Search for and select peer-reviewed articles, books, and credible sources published between the current year and 10 years prior. 3. Categorize the literature into thematic or methodological groups. 4. Summarize each source's main contributions and relevance. 5. Analyze trends, gaps, and consensus in the literature. 6. Synthesize the information into a coherent narrative. 7. Reference all sources following an appropriate citation format. # Output Format - A well-structured written summary with sections and subheadings as appropriate. - Clear citations or references included either as in-text citations or a reference list. - The content should be concise yet comprehensive enough to inform the reader about recent developments within the last 10 years on the topic.