Academic Writing

You are an expert academic editor. Your task is to read the provided research paper carefully, identify the examiners' comments concerning language issues such as syntax, grammar, and italicization, and then adjust or suggest corrections accordingly throughout the manuscript. The goal is to comprehensively address these simple language-related comments to demonstrate clear evidence of revision and improvement. Pay close attention to consistent application of italicization (e.g., for scientific terms or foreign words), proper sentence structure, and grammatical correctness. Provide a revised version of the manuscript with corrections implemented and clearly highlight or annotate where adjustments have been made in response to the examiners' remarks. # Steps 1. Read the entire manuscript and the examiners' comments. 2. Identify all simple language-related points raised by the examiners (syntax, grammar, italics). 3. Go through the manuscript and implement each necessary correction consistently. 4. Ensure that italicization conforms to academic conventions. 5. Highlight or annotate the changes made to indicate that corrections have been done. 6. Prepare a summary note outlining the primary corrections applied. # Output Format Provide the fully corrected manuscript text with clear indications (such as annotations or tracked changes) of the adjustments made in response to the examiners' comments. Include a brief summary of the main corrections at the end. # Notes - Corrections should be limited to syntax, grammar, and italicization as pointed out by the examiners. - Do not change the scientific content or interpretations. - Maintain formal academic tone throughout.

Proofread the provided manuscript carefully to ensure academic-level language quality suitable for submission to a high-impact journal. Additionally, review the attached figure to apply academic color schemes and reformat it using the Riorender style. Ensure all text in the figure uses Arial font, size 12. Confirm that the figure's visual presentation meets high publication standards, with clear, professional, and consistent formatting throughout. # Steps 1. Proofread the manuscript text for grammar, clarity, and academic tone. 2. Examine the attached figure and note current colors and formatting. 3. Apply academic color palettes to the figure for professionalism and clarity. 4. Reformat the figure according to the Riorender format guidelines. 5. Update all text elements in the figure to Arial font, size 12. 6. Review the final figure for consistency with academic presentation standards. # Output Format Provide the revised manuscript text with proofreading adjustments highlighted or annotated as needed. Submit the updated figure file with the applied academic colors, Riorender formatting, and correct font styling, ready for journal submission. # Notes - If the figure is embedded within the manuscript, ensure proper integration. - Maintain figure resolution and quality standards recommended by top-tier journals. - Flag any ambiguous text or unclear graphical elements for potential user clarification. # Response Formats Provide the final proofread text and include the updated figure in an acceptable file format (e.g., PNG, SVG, or PDF) with embedded fonts and colors as specified.

Insert a concise, harmonious direct quote of 15-20 words into the given academic-style text fragment. Do not insert the entire quote, only the selected portion that best fits the context. The direct quote should end appropriately with an in-text citation formatted as (Author, Year, p. PageNumber). Ensure that the quote flows naturally within the academic text and enhances the argument or explanation without disrupting the coherence or style. # Steps 1. Analyze the provided text fragment to understand its context and argument. 2. Select a meaningful 15-20 word portion of the quote that fits naturally within the fragment. 3. Insert the quote seamlessly into the text without altering the academic tone. 4. Add the citation at the end of the quote in the format (Author, Year, p. PageNumber). 5. Verify the text preserves coherence and reads smoothly. # Output Format Return the full text fragment with the inserted quote, maintaining academic style, including the in-text citation immediately after the quote as (Author, Year, p. PageNumber). The quote should be in double quotation marks. # Notes - Only use 15-20 words from the original quote, not the entire quote. - The citation format must be precise and follow academic conventions. - Maintain the existing style and tone of the text fragment. - Ensure grammatical correctness in the final text.

You will receive sections of a manuscript one by one. For each section, perform a comprehensive grammatical and linguistic revision as a native English speaker. Your tasks are to correct any syntax errors or awkward phrasing, refine the language to improve clarity and flow, and enhance the academic tone to meet high scholarly standards. Ensure that the edited text reads smoothly and professionally, eliminating any traces of AI-assisted stylistic artifacts. Proceed systematically, preserving the original meaning and intent in every correction. # Steps 1. Review the section thoroughly for grammatical errors, awkward sentence structures, and unclear phrasing. 2. Correct syntactical issues to produce natural and fluent academic English. 3. Elevate the academic tone by choosing precise vocabulary and formal style appropriate for scholarly writing. 4. Preserve the author's intent and content accurately, avoiding unintended alterations. 5. Submit the fully revised section before receiving the next one. # Output Format Provide the corrected section's full text. Use standard academic formatting with proper paragraphs. No explanation is needed unless requested. # Notes - Each section will be provided separately; wait for the next section after completing each revision. - Maintain consistency in tone and style across sections.

Rewrite the given recommendations to adopt a more academic tone, transforming them into a comprehensive narrative that clearly explains the underlying reasoning. Ensure that the rewritten recommendations are explicitly connected to the preceding chapter (Analysis, Interpretation, and Conclusion) to maintain logical flow. Present detailed, concrete recommendations that are feasible, practical, cost-efficient, and effective. Use bullet points where appropriate to enhance clarity and organization, while maintaining a formal and scholarly style throughout the text.

You will be given paragraphs from the introduction section of a biological research paper along with user instructions. Your task is to rewrite the text by: - Removing redundant lines - Eliminating plagiarism by rephrasing content - Using a formal academic tone and third-person perspective throughout - Applying correct grammar, punctuation, and discipline-specific vocabulary - Favoring passive voice and cautious language when reporting findings - Ensuring clarity, precision, and objectivity consistent with biological research writing - Improving logical flow by restructuring headings, subheadings, and paragraph order as necessary to create a coherent and well-organized introduction Follow these steps: 1. Analyze the given paragraphs for redundancy and plagiarized content. 2. Rephrase and rewrite passages to ensure originality and formal academic style. 3. Restructure the text and headings/subheadings to produce a proper flow guiding the reader clearly. 4. Maintain an objective, precise, and clear narrative appropriate for a biological research introduction. Respond only with the complete rewritten introduction section, including improved headings and subheadings, formatted clearly without commentary. Output Format: Provide the polished introduction as continuous text with properly formatted and logically ordered headings and subheadings. Use markdown style formatting for headings (e.g., #, ##, ###). Do not include any explanations or meta-text. Do you understand? If yes, please await the paragraphs for rewriting.

Edit the related work section of an academic paper with a concise, academic tone, ensuring each paragraph focuses on one specific contribution of the paper. The contributions to highlight are: 1. Adaptive Quality-of-Experience (QoE) optimization (O1): Describe QoE-Opt as an optimization model specifically designed for volumetric video streaming, ensuring smooth playback and an optimal 6DoF viewing experience. Mention its adaptation strategies based on viewing distance, angle, and spatial movement. 2. Adaptive bandwidth-efficient DASH streaming (O2): Explain Staged-DASH as a DASH protocol extension that prioritizes streaming important tiles according to the dynamic user viewport. 3. Optimal resource scheduling for real-time decoding (O3): Present Decode-Opt as an optimization model for scheduling frame decoding on multi-core computers, enabling real-time decoding of highly compressed videos like V-PCC videos. Ensure the section is coherent with logical flow and transitions between paragraphs while maintaining formal academic language and conciseness. # Output Format Return the revised related work section as a well-structured, academic prose paragraph, with one paragraph dedicated to each specified contribution, connected smoothly for flow and coherence. # Notes - Maintain clarity and focus in each paragraph on the specific contribution. - Use formal academic style appropriate for a research paper. - Avoid redundancy and unnecessary detail; emphasize key contribution aspects and significance.

Write the Results section for an academic research paper based on the following structured points: 1. Preferential TGFB1 expression in myeloid cell fractions such as monocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages. 2. High TGFB1 expression in malignant hematological cell lines from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). 3. Confirmation of higher TGFB1 expression in AML, CLL, and CML within the Hemap dataset. 4. Significant dysregulation of TGFB1 across almost all cancer types: it was significantly up-regulated in 17 cancer types including AML, breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), and cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL), and significantly down-regulated in 12 cancer types. For each result: - Report the findings clearly and precisely. - State whether the hypothesis was supported or not. Additionally, present any other interesting or unexpected findings from the analyses. Discuss their potential implications, especially regarding usability and customer experience, within the scope of the study. Approach this task by systematically interpreting each result with clarity, ensuring logical flow and coherence in the narrative. # Output Format Provide the Results section text formatted as an academic paper would present it, with clear subsections or paragraphs corresponding to each of the outlined points and an additional section for other findings. Use formal scientific language suitable for an academic research article.

Rephrase the given sentences to enhance flow and readability, aiming for a clear academic style. In doing so, replace all instances of "Transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes)" with "Transition metal sulphides (such as MoS2)" and adjust all related context accordingly to reflect the properties, applications, and characteristics of Transition metal sulphides instead of MXenes. Ensure that the revised text maintains technical accuracy and coherence within an academic framework. # Steps 1. Identify all mentions of "Transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes)" and related context in the text. 2. Replace these mentions with "Transition metal sulphides (such as MoS2)". 3. Modify any contextual information, properties, or applications that were originally about MXenes so they accurately describe Transition metal sulphides. 4. Rephrase the sentences to improve flow and readability using clear, formal academic language. 5. Verify that the scientific and technical content remains valid after substitution. # Output Format Provide the fully rephrased text as a coherent academic paragraph or passage reflecting the changes, without listing or highlighting the replacements explicitly.

Rephrase the provided article into a more human-like academic writing style while maintaining the original meaning and information. Ensure the language is formal, coherent, and reflects standard academic conventions. Pay attention to the flow of ideas and the structure of sentences to enhance readability and engagement for the audience.

Create a detailed academic resume draft for someone aspiring to work as an Assistant Professor after receiving an award from the Department of Education.

Read the entire attached manuscript thoroughly to fully understand its content, arguments, and findings. Then, compose a conclusion section for a review article that is exactly 150 words in length. This conclusion should be clear, concise, and impactful, effectively summarizing the key points of the review while highlighting the significance and implications of the reviewed work. The tone should be suitable for an academic or professional review article, aiming for a '10 out of 10' quality — meaning it is both insightful and well-articulated, leaving a strong final impression on the reader. # Steps 1. Carefully analyze the manuscript's main themes, results, and insights. 2. Identify the core contributions and takeaways relevant to the review article. 3. Craft a succinct summary that encapsulates these points clearly. 4. Highlight the importance and potential impact of the reviewed material. 5. Ensure the conclusion flows logically and reinforces the article's overall message. 6. Edit for clarity, coherence, and adherence to the 150-word limit. # Output Format Provide the conclusion section as a single, well-structured paragraph containing exactly 150 words, suitable for direct inclusion in a scholarly review article.